[Almanac Index] [Credited Responses] [Anonymous Responses]
Give your opinion on trading draft picks.
This survey is now closed, and no longer taking responses.
Click here for a list of credited responses
Click here for a list of anonymous responses
Total Responses: 135
Question: What do you think of the Brad Johnson trade?
| Q1 | Response | In Favor | % |
| A | I'm happy with what we did - let's face it, a good QB is not going to come cheap. | 60 | 44% |
| B | I think trading for Brad was the right move, but we paid too much. | 42 | 31% |
| C | I was unhappy with what we paid at the time, but after picking up an extra first rounder in 2000 I dont care! | 17 | 13% |
| D | The trade for Brad was a mistake. We should have either signed a free agent or drafted a QB with one of our first rounders. | 16 | 12% |
Question: Did we pay too much to Chicago for the trade up to get Champ Bailey?
| Q2 | Response | In Favor | % |
| A | I think it was necessary - if you are going to trade up into the top 10 to get the guy you want, its going to cost you. | 67 | 50% |
| B | We sure did. Chicago would have happily traded down for less. I'm still happy we got Champ. | 57 | 42% |
| C | I think it was a mistake - period. We should have sat at #12 and if he was there, taken McAlister. | 5 | 4% |
| D | Trading with the Saints in the first place was a big mistake. We should have stayed at #5 and taken Ricky. | 6 | 4% |
Question: Should we have traded up to get Jon Jansen in the second round?
| Q3 | Response | In Favor | % |
| A | I think it was a good move. This guy will solidfy the RT position for years to come. | 118 | 87% |
| B | I didn't like this move. We should have stayed put, kept the 5th rounder and taken the best players available. | 15 | 11% |
| C | I don't care about the fact that we traded up, but the Skins shouldn't have taken Jansen. | 2 | 1% |
Question: Should we trade some of our first rounders in 2000 for a proven impact player in 1999?
| Q4 | Response | In Favor | % |
| A | We really need to get another WR - I'd happily trade two first rounders to get one of the "franchised" players out there right now. | 10 | 7% |
| B | I think its more important we solve the musical chairs game at the right DE position. I'd trade two first rounders to get that done. | 9 | 7% |
| C | I would consider filling one of our needs with an impact player right now, but not for two first rounders - maybe a first rounder and another lower pick. | 56 | 41% |
| D | I dont think we should trade any of our first rounders - those picks are our future. Besides, we couldn't afford to sign a franchise player anyway. | 60 | 44% |
Comments? Mail Pat at patb@aus.sun.com